Headshot of Adam Patenaude.
Headshot of Adam Patenaude.
Headshot of Adam Patenaude.
Blurry image of a white wall next to an orange wall.  A shelf with small white objects is visible.
Blurry image of a white wall next to an orange wall.  A shelf with small white objects is visible.
Blurry image of a white wall next to an orange wall.  A shelf with small white objects is visible.

Adam J. Patenaude

Partner

Adam is a seasoned trial lawyer with a focus on defending complex medical negligence and professional liability cases. Acting for clients in out-of-court settlements or in the courtroom, he brings relentless advocacy to both administrative and civil proceedings.

Areas of Expertise

  • Medical Malpractice Defence

  • Municipality Liability / Public Entity Defence

  • Professional Negligence Claims

  • Property Damage Claims

  • General and Commercial Liability

  • Commercial insurance coverage

Education

  • Admitted to the Ontario Bar (2007)

  • Baccalaureate of Laws, Cum Laude, University of Ottawa (2006)

  • Bachelor of Journalism with Law, Carleton University (2000)

Education

  • Admitted to the Ontario Bar (2007)

  • Baccalaureate of Laws, Cum Laude, University of Ottawa (2006)

  • Bachelor of Journalism with Law, Carleton University (2000)

Education

  • Admitted to the Ontario Bar (2007)

  • Baccalaureate of Laws, Cum Laude, University of Ottawa (2006)

  • Bachelor of Journalism with Law, Carleton University (2000)

Awards and Recognition

  • Recognized in the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory in the area of medical negligence (2021-2025)

  • Recognized in Best Lawyers in Canada in the area of medical negligence, health care law, and professional malpractice

Awards and Recognition

  • Recognized in the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory in the area of medical negligence (2021-2025)

  • Recognized in Best Lawyers in Canada in the area of medical negligence, health care law, and professional malpractice

Awards and Recognition

  • Recognized in the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory in the area of medical negligence (2021-2025)

  • Recognized in Best Lawyers in Canada in the area of medical negligence, health care law, and professional malpractice

Noteworthy Cases

  • Graham v. Bridgepoint Health, 2025, defence of allegation of  delay in diagnosis of infection.

  • Newton v. Florence, 2025, Defence of allegation of delay in diagnosis of septic hip.

  • Penate v. Martoglio, 2024, Obstetrical Malpractice jury trial and motion to discharge jury.

  • McKee v. Shahid, 2024, Motion to dismiss claim against psychiatrist, no duty of care.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Tan, 2024, Motion to Reopen hearing.

  • Kotorashvilli v. Lee, Defence of claim of surgical negligence.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Tan, 2021. Defence of allegations of sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Wright, 2018. Defence of allegations of conduct unbecoming a physician related to use of social media.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Izzeldin, 2018. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Laity, 2018. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Beairsto, 2017. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Beaney v. Lindsay Professional Building, 2017, Occupier’s Liability, jury trial.

  • Duggan v Lakeridge, 2017. Motion for further medical assessment, discovery and cross motion for summary judgment.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Chung, 2014. Defence of allegations of failing to maintain the standard of the profession, unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Singh, P. M., 2013. Defence of allegations of failing to maintain the standard of the profession in obstetrical care.

  • Watt v. Schwind, 2011, obstetrical malpractice, jury trial.

  • Laity v. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2018. Mental Health Act Application.

  • Duggan v Lakeridge, 2017. Motion for further medical assessment, discovery and cross motion for summary judgment.

  • Mereweather v. Austin, 2011. Motion regarding application of Regulated Health Professions Act to production in civil actions.

  • Dufferin v. Santos, 2011, allegations of negligent road design.

  • Smyth v. Perth and Smiths Falls District Hospital, 2008, Divisional Court and Ontario Court of Appeal. Appeal on Hospital privileges dispute.

Noteworthy Cases

  • Graham v. Bridgepoint Health, 2025, defence of allegation of  delay in diagnosis of infection.

  • Newton v. Florence, 2025, Defence of allegation of delay in diagnosis of septic hip.

  • Penate v. Martoglio, 2024, Obstetrical Malpractice jury trial and motion to discharge jury.

  • McKee v. Shahid, 2024, Motion to dismiss claim against psychiatrist, no duty of care.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Tan, 2024, Motion to Reopen hearing.

  • Kotorashvilli v. Lee, Defence of claim of surgical negligence.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Tan, 2021. Defence of allegations of sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Wright, 2018. Defence of allegations of conduct unbecoming a physician related to use of social media.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Izzeldin, 2018. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Laity, 2018. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Beairsto, 2017. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Beaney v. Lindsay Professional Building, 2017, Occupier’s Liability, jury trial.

  • Duggan v Lakeridge, 2017. Motion for further medical assessment, discovery and cross motion for summary judgment.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Chung, 2014. Defence of allegations of failing to maintain the standard of the profession, unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Singh, P. M., 2013. Defence of allegations of failing to maintain the standard of the profession in obstetrical care.

  • Watt v. Schwind, 2011, obstetrical malpractice, jury trial.

  • Laity v. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2018. Mental Health Act Application.

  • Duggan v Lakeridge, 2017. Motion for further medical assessment, discovery and cross motion for summary judgment.

  • Mereweather v. Austin, 2011. Motion regarding application of Regulated Health Professions Act to production in civil actions.

  • Dufferin v. Santos, 2011, allegations of negligent road design.

  • Smyth v. Perth and Smiths Falls District Hospital, 2008, Divisional Court and Ontario Court of Appeal. Appeal on Hospital privileges dispute.

Noteworthy Cases

  • Graham v. Bridgepoint Health, 2025, defence of allegation of  delay in diagnosis of infection.

  • Newton v. Florence, 2025, Defence of allegation of delay in diagnosis of septic hip.

  • Penate v. Martoglio, 2024, Obstetrical Malpractice jury trial and motion to discharge jury.

  • McKee v. Shahid, 2024, Motion to dismiss claim against psychiatrist, no duty of care.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Tan, 2024, Motion to Reopen hearing.

  • Kotorashvilli v. Lee, Defence of claim of surgical negligence.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Tan, 2021. Defence of allegations of sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Wright, 2018. Defence of allegations of conduct unbecoming a physician related to use of social media.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Izzeldin, 2018. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Laity, 2018. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Beairsto, 2017. Defence of allegations of unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Beaney v. Lindsay Professional Building, 2017, Occupier’s Liability, jury trial.

  • Duggan v Lakeridge, 2017. Motion for further medical assessment, discovery and cross motion for summary judgment.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Chung, 2014. Defence of allegations of failing to maintain the standard of the profession, unprofessional conduct and sexual abuse.

  • Ontario (College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) v. Singh, P. M., 2013. Defence of allegations of failing to maintain the standard of the profession in obstetrical care.

  • Watt v. Schwind, 2011, obstetrical malpractice, jury trial.

  • Laity v. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2018. Mental Health Act Application.

  • Duggan v Lakeridge, 2017. Motion for further medical assessment, discovery and cross motion for summary judgment.

  • Mereweather v. Austin, 2011. Motion regarding application of Regulated Health Professions Act to production in civil actions.

  • Dufferin v. Santos, 2011, allegations of negligent road design.

  • Smyth v. Perth and Smiths Falls District Hospital, 2008, Divisional Court and Ontario Court of Appeal. Appeal on Hospital privileges dispute.

A Rewarding Experience

Adam Patenaude is a partner in Lerners' Toronto office and a member of the Health Law, and Specialty Risk and Insurance groups. When a dispute cannot be resolved outside of court, Adam draws on extensive trial experience in both the administrative arena and the civil courts to advance and protect the interests of his clients. “My favourite place to be is in the courtroom because I’m completely focused on winning the case,” he says.

Where a trial is not warranted, Adam builds strategies to reach

favourable settlements for his clients in the quickest and least costly way possible. Adam provides advice and representation on high stakes matters involving medical negligence, regulatory complaints, and disciplinary hearings. His insurance law practice focuses on coverage litigation, both defence and subrogated claims. Adam has also assisted clients on the plaintiff side with claims against government authorities.

“The constant challenge of learning new subject matter in the field of medicine and working for clients you admire and

respect, makes practising health law a tremendously rewarding experience,” says Adam. “I also enjoy the challenge of facing the new scenarios that arise day-to-day in my insurance defence practice.”

A father of three, Adam has served the community as president of a local preschool for several years and as a competitive hockey coach.

Adam Patenaude is a partner in Lerners' Toronto office and a member of the Health Law, and Specialty Risk and Insurance groups. When a dispute cannot be resolved outside of court, Adam draws on extensive trial experience in both the administrative arena and the civil courts to advance and protect the interests of his clients. “My favourite place to be is in the courtroom because I’m completely focused on winning the case,” he says.

Where a trial is not warranted, Adam builds strategies to reach favourable settlements for his clients in the quickest and least costly way possible. Adam provides advice and representation on high stakes matters involving medical negligence, regulatory complaints, and disciplinary hearings. His insurance law practice focuses on coverage litigation, both defence and subrogated claims. Adam has also assisted clients on the plaintiff side with claims against government authorities.

“The constant challenge of learning new subject matter in the field of medicine and working for clients you admire and respect, makes practising health law a tremendously rewarding experience,” says Adam. “I also enjoy the challenge of facing the new scenarios that arise day-to-day in my insurance defence practice.”

A father of three, Adam has served the community as president of a local preschool for several years and as a competitive hockey coach.

Adam Patenaude is a partner in Lerners' Toronto office and a member of the Health Law, and Specialty Risk and Insurance groups. When a dispute cannot be resolved outside of court, Adam draws on extensive trial experience in both the administrative arena and the civil courts to advance and protect the interests of his clients. “My favourite place to be is in the courtroom because I’m completely focused on winning the case,” he says.

Where a trial is not warranted, Adam builds strategies to reach favourable settlements for his clients in the quickest and least costly way possible. Adam provides advice and representation on high stakes matters involving medical negligence, regulatory complaints, and disciplinary hearings. His insurance law practice focuses on coverage litigation, both defence and subrogated claims. Adam has also assisted clients on the plaintiff side with claims against government authorities.

“The constant challenge of learning new subject matter in the field of medicine and working for clients you admire and respect, makes practising health law a tremendously rewarding experience,” says Adam. “I also enjoy the challenge of facing the new scenarios that arise day-to-day in my insurance defence practice.”

A father of three, Adam has served the community as president of a local preschool for several years and as a competitive hockey coach.

Reach Out

Everyone at Lerners is committed to ensuring your matters are addressed with the attention and care you expect.

Reach Out

Everyone at Lerners is committed to ensuring your matters are addressed with the attention and care you expect.

Reach Out

Everyone at Lerners is committed to ensuring your matters are addressed with the attention and care you expect.